Author Archive

Can business principles, such as impact measurement, help us create the change we need?

An unfortunate trend of applying business principles to giving, described as ‘philanthrocapitalism’, is starting to take a hold. Part of this is a focus on data and measuring the impact (outcomes) of projects. The Measuring and Evaluating Outcomes in Practice annual conference today, organised by New Philanthropy Capital, is focused entirely on how to measure impact to attract funding.

philanthrocapitalismThe problem with this is that the ‘outcome’ most worth fighting for, with the longest-term impact, is also the hardest to measure – and that’s social change. The independent, grassroots groups creating the change we need are also less likely to have the resources needed to measure outcomes in the way some funders expect. Another point worth remembering is that you can never fully measure the impact of social change and campaigning work. For example, the campaign to stop the Newbury bypass failed to stop the road being built, but after that other road schemes were fought and one after the other were cancelled. There’s no question that the Newbury bypass campaign’s high media profile, mobilisation of the public and development and testing of strategies played a big part in the success of the campaigns that followed.

Focusing on measurable outcomes can discourage groups from addressing wide-reaching systemic issues and encourages them to play safe rather than engaging in the innovating and risk-taking that’s needed to create long-term change. Cathy Pharoah writes:

Yes, there is an easier way to produce results-based performance. It means tackling problems that are solvable, focusing on outcomes that are achievable and outputs or indicators that can be measured.

But the sector’s role has always been to address precisely those issues that society has found difficult to resolve – issues that require inputs at individual, community, and political levels… where attitudinal or behavioural change involves improvisation, trial and error, and where the best outcome might be three steps forward, two steps back.

The focus on data can also mean concerning yourself with quantity over quality. Training 100 health workers in Pakistan might look great on paper, but if they don’t actually go on to do the work, because no one is willing to fund the salaries, it’s hardly an achievement.  If you’ve supplied food to 200 people, but neglected to spend the time and resources to reach people most isolated and marginalised by society, have you really achieved more than a group who did, but as a consequence only fed 150? Is providing intensive therapy to 10 deeply traumatised asylum seekers less worthy of support than helping more – but less traumatised – people?

Philanthrocapitalism also tends to involve huge sums of money, from corporations and wealthy individuals, which can reduce organisations’ independence and ability to challenge the corporate sector. For example, Save the Children have recently partnered with GlaxoSmithKline, which is surprising considering their earlier criticism of the company for pricing their drugs out of reach of people who need them most. It will be interesting to see how that relationship evolves as they work together to develop new products and expand across Africa. There will likely be more partnerships like this as traditional sources of funding continues to dry up.

We all want to know we are having an impact, and it’s important we reflect, learn and evolve, but let’s not become short-sighted and overlook important factors such as inclusivity, innovation, solid ethics and social change, by turning it all into a numbers game.

For more info on philanthrocapitalism, Michael Edwards provides a great critique in the article Philanthrocapitalism: After the Goldrush and in his book Just Another Emperor.


What is equality?

These days it’s very confusing to figure out what people really mean. People use the same language to describe entirely different values. Equality, social justice, root causes, systemic change… What does it all mean?

The term ‘equality’ has many different interpretations. Surely striving for equality is simply about creating a world where we are all equal? But for many, all that matters is that we all have an equal opportunity to climb to the top of the social ladder and become rich and powerful. That’s what the equality and diversity laws exist for. It seems less people are interested in doing away with that hierarchy altogether, to create a society where we are all equal.

Equality is not just about wealth but also about having the power to make decisions that affect your life. The Spirit Level and other studies have shown that a more equal society benefits everyone in it; an unequal society is an unhappy one. If we are all to live full, healthy and happy lives we must all have equal wealth and power, and to achieve that we need to completely change the way society is structured.

Because of the way society is currently run, we are not all born with an equal chance of living a fulfilled and happy life. If you’re white, male, middle-class, heterosexual and are not disabled, you’re much more likely to get what you want out of life than others. It’s not a matter of giving individuals a hand, but creating a society that is structured in a way that no matter who you are, you’ve got what you need to live a good life.

Social justice is another term that is used in different ways. On the name alone, the Centre for Social Justice sounds like the kind of organisation Edge Fund might be well aligned to. Maybe we should get our application in quick for their upcoming Social Justice Awards. But let’s look a bit closer. The Centre for Social Justice was set up by Iain Duncan Smith – yes, the very same Conservative MP behind many of this government’s welfare reforms. Social justice surely means treating people fairly and with respect for their human rights, and in whichever way is needed to put us all on an equal footing. However, it doesn’t seem this understanding of social justice is what Iain Duncan Smith had in mind when he formed the organisation, if his latest antics are anything to go by.

It gets more intriguing. The Centre for Social Justice explains on its website that it addresses the ‘root causes’ of poverty. The first thought is, surely, that as an organisation set up by the Conservatives, it’s not actually supporting work to challenge its own commitment to take everything from the have-nots and give it to the already-haves? No, of course not. According to the Centre for Social Justice, the root causes of poverty are family breakdown, educational failure, worklessness, debt and addiction. The likes of CSJ are doing well in convincing people of their way of thinking; recent reports from Joseph Rowntree Foundation and BritainThinks show a rising number of people believe the main reasons for poverty are linked to behaviours and characteristics of parents (e.g. addictions, not wanting to work, lack of education) rather than wider societal issues.

Some people are very good at reaching conclusions that suit them, rather than digging a little deeper. Why are families breaking down? Why is there educational failure, unemployment, debt and addiction? Could it be anything to do with us living in a world where our political and economic systems put profit and personal gain before the common good? Where public services are torn apart and benefits taken from the most vulnerable people, leaving communities with nothing while the rich continue to prosper?

Continuing to ignore the real root causes of poverty, inequality and injustice is a significant barrier to creating the change we need. When this is done in a charitable sense it can be even harder to understand. Take Chris Hohn, one of the UK’s most generous philanthropists.  In one year alone he gave nearly £500m to his charity Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), which aims to help children living in poverty in ‘developing countries’.

So how is Chris Hohn able to donate so much money to charity? He runs a hedge fund and gives a proportion of the profits to CIFF. The hedge fund has apparently invested in companies such as Lockheed Martin, Philip Morris, News Corp, Japan Tobacco, Porsche, Coal India and Enagas. Not only do many of these companies directly cause harm to communities in the Global South but the whole financial system that allows people to make huge profits from investing in unethical, exploitative industries is the very same system that causes poverty and inequality. If Hohn used his undoubted intelligence and skills to tackle capitalism, rather than playing it to raise money for its victims, he might find his fundraising efforts are no longer needed.  The same goes for environmental NGOs investing their endowments in fossil fuels – their decision to place their financial resources in these dirty hands seems just a little counter-productive to their stated aim of saving the planet. Save the Children is another recent example; they’ve just agreed a £15m partnership with GlaxoSmithKline, with a shared aim of saving the lives of a million children. Save the Children have criticised GSK in the past for pricing their drugs (particularly HIV drugs) out of the reach of the people who need them most. How many millions of lives would GSK have saved by now if they’d have made their drugs more accessible? But then if they prioritised saving lives over making a profit, perhaps they wouldn’t have money to give to Save the Children…

A better world for all of us surely lies in creating a world where we are all treated fairly according to our situation and means, and where we are all equal. That’s going to take radical social change that only seems possible through addressing the real root causes of inequality and injustice, such as the power imbalances in society and the systems that maintain them. Whether you interpret ‘systemic change’ as us needing to reform capitalism (and other systems that create inequality), or whether we need something else entirely different in its place, it’s clear we need a massive change.


Report From ‘Electric’ Edge Fund Scotland Launch

Screen-Shot-2013-04-22-at-12.05.27

New members signed-up, new projects formed and a belter of a programme took place as Edge Fund launched in Scotland a few weeks ago.

Hosted by The African Carribean Centre, those in attendance heard from long term anti-poverty campaigner Cathy McCormack, comedian and former MSP Rosie Kane, the people behind the new documantary from Dartmouth Films ‘The Spirit Level’, Glasgow based professional filmakers, artists and activists ‘The Camcorder Guerillas’, GalgaelGoldschwanz from the Glasgow Sex Workers Open University, prolific activist and organiser Ann Lynch, Hermine Makangu from Let Freedom Ring and finally AnneSwartz and Jessie Harvey from Scottish Kinship Care Alliance.

The party then continued into the night with music provided by The Woven Tents (Kids in the park) Band and One Love Promotions (Reggae and Soca).

Katharine Round, from ‘The Spirit Level’ commented on the night:

“Thank you for inviting me to be part of the Edge Fund launch night – it’s a fantastic initiative and brilliant to be there with so many inspiring individuals all working for positive change in their communities. The atmosphere was electric and a sign for big things in the future!”

Thank you so much to everyone who came and who performed! Watch this space for the upcoming video. And a big thank you to Larissa Moran for photos and videos and to the one, the only, African Caribbean Network Scotland for hosting the night! More photos of all the performers can be found here.

To get involved in the Scottish developments please email edgefund@riseup.net.


Ten days until application deadline

Edge Fund Round 2 is still open for applications. The deadline is 22 April. Please help us spread the word to small groups working in the UK for social, economic and environmental justice and for an equal world. Find out how to apply, what we fund and who received funding in the first round on our website.

Edge Fund round 2 open


Edge Fund: £40,000 lighter…

2013-03-12 pounds 590

On 16th March around 35 people gathered in a community centre in North Islington, London to collectively decide how the first round of Edge Fund funding should be distributed amongst the final 15 projects. The gathering included representatives of the projects themselves and Edge Fund members. Before the day £10,000 had already been shared out between 13 runners up, leaving £30,000 for the final 15.

At the start of the day people expressed feelings of both anxiety and excitement at being the first to try an entirely new, democratic grant-making process. It is very unusual for applicants to know who else is in the running for the limited funds, let alone to get the chance to spend the day with them and the decision-makers of the fund to decide together which projects should receive funding.

The first to arrive were Edge members who came early to prepare a hearty soup for lunch. As people arrived the table filled with bread and other food to share. It was a rainy morning and the closures on the Northern line meant many people arrived late, delaying the start of the day. But people quickly relaxed in each other’s company through a few exercises to help people to get to know each other. People brought objects with them to help tell their stories of why they do what they do. A bag of freshly picked organic leaves, a Romani flag, photos of protests and other items soon got conversation going.

Ground rules were set collectively; be gentle, honest, respectful, curious, it’s also ok to challenge each other. We then laid out and discussed the funding priorities; groups which cannot get funding elsewhere who are either people facing oppression and are self-organising to challenge this or groups standing beside them to bring about systemic change. Some trial applications, one group of lesbian, gay, transgender and queer people of colour and another working in solidarity with immigration detainees, showed the diversity of opinion in the room. People stood along a line according to their score out of ten for each project and for both people were spread across the room. Questions were raised around what creates social change, what projects cannot get funding elsewhere and the importance of the most affected communities being involved in leading the work.

(more…)


Invite to the Edge Fund Glasgow launch

Welcome 2013 with revolutionary fervour at the EDGE FUND GLASGOW LAUNCH PARTY

Saturday 6th April

African Caribbean Network Centre, 66-68 Osborne Street, Glasgow, G1 5QH

7 – 10pm

Image

ARE YOU A COMMUNITY ACTIVIST, ARTIST OR PERFORMER RAISING YOUR VOICE FOR JUSTICE?

Edge Fund activists are looking for artists, activists, performers and community organisers to make the Glasgow launch night amazing. The Edge Fund is a really good sign of things to come. There are so many amazing people out there who can benefit. We want to showcase the biggest talents from the roaring belly of resistance on our streets and in our communities. Please do email over any links / suggestions ASAP to edgecommunity@riseup.net – Check out the Edge Fund launch in London heremore videos and footage here.

Programme on the night

7.00 – 7.30 Performances – why we need to build community power .. the issues alive in Glasgow.
7.30 – 8.00 Small group feedback
8.00 – 8.15 – Q and A
8.15- 8.45 – Soulful music – chillax – connect shout outs to different crews, organisations and groups in the building, in case people wish to make connections and network.

Please RSVP if you would like to contribute and / or reserve a ticket ASAP to edgecommunity@riseup.net.

And beforehand…

LET FREEDOM RING! POPULAR EDUCATION TRAINING – READING OUR REALITY IN 2013
SATURDAY 6TH APRIL – AFRICAN CARIBBEAN NETWORK CENTRE, 66 – 68 OSBORNE STREET, GLASGOW G1 5QH – 4 – 6pm

Let Freedom Ring! – from South Africa comes the UK launch of Training for Transformation in 2013 – “The greatest weapon in the hand of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.” ― Steve Biko www.theglassishalffull.co.uk

PLEASE NOTE THERE ARE LIMITED SPACES FOR THE TRAINING – MAXIMUM 20 SPACES – please respond ASAP on letfreedomring@theglassishalffull.co.uk. It Is Free! :)


Social justice and philanthropy – unlikely bedfellows?

conferenceOn 1st March we spoke at the Social Justice Philanthropy Conference in London. Stephen Pittam of the Working Group on Philanthropy for Social Justice and Peace kicked off. He talked about social justice philanthropy coming about as a response to the neoliberal agenda and outlined some key themes such as addressing root causes and structural injustices and strengthening marginalised communities to speak for themselves. A good start. But this was swiftly followed by Andrew Barnett of Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation who argued that the ‘mire of lofty ideals’ often resulted in less effective grant-making (read speech in full). It’s hard to understand why someone concerned with social justice would want to perpetuate society’s inequalities through their own processes. He went on to note we should work more with the private sector and bridge the gap between the for-profit and non-profit worlds.

The discussion then went off on a worrying tangent about Corporate Social Responsibility. Apparently corporations are beginning to understand that making unpopular decisions behind closed doors is not being tolerated any longer, especially when the public finds out. Is fear of being found out an indication of ethics? A suggestion was made that perhaps bankers should start up their own charitable funds, each putting in a little of their inflated salaries, presumably to improve public relations.

It’s not just social justice that has different interpretations. Many people throughout the day talked about addressing root causes. One person talked about the importance of ‘teaching a man to fish’, while another talked of giving fishing nets instead of fish. But is this addressing the real root cause of the problem? People are quick to stop asking why. Why can’t people buy their own nets? Why are they no longer making their own nets from natural materials? Why are there no fish in the ocean? Why do communities lose their traditional skills that have been passed on from generation to generation? (more…)


Community outreach strategy launched

Screen Shot 2012-12-28 at 10.35.07

This week Edge is celebrating the beginning of a new stage in the community building process. New Community Outreach positions have begun to help continue supporting communities organising for justice and equality all over the UK. The overarching aim of this development is to ensure the fund reaches out to as many diverse projects covering as many different issues as possible.

Currently our membership and applications are not as representative of all the different people, communities and campaigns in the UK as they need to be. We realise that to reach a wide range of people we need to listen, learn and spend time on the ground with different communities. As a new fund we’ve had limited capacity to do this but are excited to now be putting outreach plans into action.

Luckily we have two people who will be working together in these roles one day a week and so a plan is underway to organise and network within many different communities across the UK. We hope by doing this we make sure word gets out to the right places ahead of our second round of funding which will open soon with a deadline of April 22nd.

Dan who has just started the job said:

“In the face of the most unimaginable horrors of inequality I am honoured to be part of the Edge Fund Community Outreach plans. Through the strengthening of our relationships on the ground the conversations within our communities are changing. Conversations around being victims and continuously marginalised are changing to being fearless interconnected communities for justice whom are questioning power, providing hope and building strong people’s movements for change.

Please get in contact anytime over the coming months with any ideas and questions. There will be launch events across the UK and regular communications of how to organise in our communities, watch this space”

Joe, our other community outreach worker said:

“I truly believe that if Edge Fund is built up in the right way – it could become an extremely powerful place of support for grassroots organisations and movements in the UK. I am looking forward to meeting and linking up with all the great projects that are out there.”

Please contact us to arrange a meeting if you’d like to find out more about funding available, becoming a member or contact point within your community or network, or for any other query. You can contact Joe and Dan at: edgecommunity@riseup.net or call 07767 126 915


Edge Fund: The story so far

In the beginning we had 20-30 people come to each meeting. People represented a wide range of issues and communities and commented on how nice it was to be amongst such a diverse group, not least having both donors and activists in the same room. There were lively and less lively discussions about what function Edge should have, what our collective values are, our funding criteria and all sorts of other things. But as meetings passed it became clear there were only a small number of people willing to get involved in the nitty gritty of writing our rules, setting up bank accounts and all the boring but necessary stuff. But that was fine, because the people in the room are the right people, and the job got done!

Our starting point was the aim to put decision-making about funding into the hands of those who don’t usually have that power. It’s not that hard to find people from the usual activist networks to devolve that power to, but it’s much more difficult to get people from the most oppressed communities to take part.  We’ve long deliberated over use of language and even put on a special event targeting these communities, which failed to attract any number of the people we wanted to reach. A few people mentioned to us that they knew some groups were wary and wanted to see what happens in the first round before considering getting involved. Discussions with progressive funders like Community Foundation of Northern Ireland and Social Justice Fund North West have confirmed that this process takes time and certainly much more than just inviting people to come to you.

We announced our first round on 1st October without knowing quite what to expect. To keep it simple and accessible the first stage of the application process was just one page. By the end of that month we’d received around 50 applications and were excited at the prospect of receiving a hundred or more by the 1st December deadline. We received 334! People from 118 different countries viewed our website, with 20,440 page views during the application period. Applications covered a wide range of issues including criminal justice, detention centres, LGBTQ, mining, climate change, violence against Travellers, rights for disabled people, mental health and racism.

(more…)


Come to the Edge Fund launch party

We’ve had a great response to our launch party tomorrow night, so we’ve doubled the space to get more people in! There’s still room if you’d like to come; please RSVP to edgefund @ riseup.net and we’ll send more details.

launch flier

 

 


Are you a community activist, artist or performer raising your voice for justice?

End 2012 with a bang and welcome 2013 with revolutionary fervour at EDGE FUND LAUNCH PARTY.

December 15th in London. Venue tbc.

Edge Fund are looking for artists, activists, performers and community organisers to make the launch night amazing. We want to showcase the biggest talents from the roaring belly of resistance on our streets and in our communities. If you’re interested in taking part or have ideas about others who might be, please do email over any links / suggestions ASAP to alright@theglassishalffull.co.uk.


Edge Fund: still time to apply, help us spread the word!

We’ve had 70 applications for our first round so far and there’s still plenty of time to apply. Our deadline is 1 December and we initially we just need one page with basic information about your group. Full details on the How to Apply page on our website. We’re particularly looking for applications from communities who are most affected by inequality and injustice, as well as groups working in solidarity with them and working towards systemic change. Please help us spread the word!

Image


Edge Fund: First round open

The first round is now open! Details on how to apply are on our website: http://edgefund.org.uk/how-to-apply/

Please help us spread the word!


A step closer

The minutes of the last meeting, on 14 September, are now online.

14 September minutes.

The good news is, we’re (hopefully) looking at an early October launch!


Edge Fund featured in Alliance Magazine

This month’s Alliance Magazine, a leading magazine for philanthropy and social investment worldwide, features an article about Edge Fund. You can read the full article below.

http://www.alliancemagazine.org/en/content/edge-fund-aims-live-social-justice-values


Some major steps forward for the Edge Fund

In the last Edge Fund meeting, on 25 July, some major decisions were made about the fund’s values, decision-making and how it will operate. You can now read the minutes of the meeting on the website: http://edgefund.org.uk/get-involved/meetings/25-july-2012-minutes/

If you’d like to get involved please contact edgefund [at] riseup.net.


Occupy Philanthropy: how can we devolve the philanthropic power of the 1% to the 99% to create the social change we need?

On 21 April a group of seventeen activists and donors came together to a meeting titled “Occupy Philanthropy: how can we devolve the philanthropic power of the 1% to the 99% to create the social change we need?” to discuss how the power of philanthropy could both be devolved to, and help support, grassroots activists and marginalised communities to create radical social change.

The discussion started with the importance of accessibility. Some of the group commented that funding needs to be accessible to as many groups as possible and therefore several considerations need to be taken into account. Firstly, we need to move away from forms as much as possible. There are many groups which are unable to complete application forms for a variety of reasons, ranging from not having internet access to download forms or receive them by email, not having computers, having difficulties communicating in English and not being able to understand the jargon often used by funding bodies. Many of the group also agreed that the norm is for groups to tailor their applications to what the funder wants to support.

Groups should be able to introduce themselves in a way that suits them and the application process should rely more on personal visits and phone calls than on forms. Often what is presented in a form does not accurately portray the passion, skills and vision of the group. However, application forms are often used in the place of visits because it’s much quicker; a large group of trusted people will be needed to conduct visits if this path is taken.

It was agreed by many in the group that both activists and the communities that we aim to help should be included in the decision-making process. A form of online direct democracy could be useful, as well as bringing people together for meetings face-to-face. Many in the group felt that funders should also be part of the process as it is an educational exercise for them and they also have a valuable perspective. Others felt that having funders involved would change the feeling in the room from one that is supportive (where groups can share challenges as well as successes), to one of competition. Careful thought will need to be given to the power dynamic between funders and activists but also how it might affect the activists involved in decision-making in the wider movement.

Facilitating events to bring funded groups together for skill-shares and support could be a powerful way to strengthen groups and projects.

A popular idea was for the Edge Fund to be run regionally. This would make sense in terms of visiting and assessing groups as a relatively small group of people could not be expected to travel the entire country to do this. Also, funders could be involved in decision making only for those regions they are not funding personally to potentially overcome issues of power dynamics where funders are present. On the other hand, if all funds are pooled, would this be necessary?

Transparency is also vitally important. Minutes should be made available, although it was agreed that identities of individuals should be protected if they wished. Could decisions be made in public? We also need to ensure that it is clear that the Edge Fund is a work in progress; to be approachable and open to input and ideas from others.

Towards the end of the meeting was an important discussion about how some NGOs are co-opting social movements and the need for supporting grassroots activism.

Since much more discussion is needed to draft plans for the fund, another meeting will need to be scheduled with a suggested date of 19 May. Location to be decided. We will find a slightly bigger room so more people can be invited, although the group will remain under 30 people for now, until the public session.  The original group are welcome to invite others, particularly if they represent issues/ communities not already represented within the group.

Full minutes will be available shortly.